Yes, will work also to read the value directly in the API pages.
#WINDOWS MASS RENAME BASED ON TIMESTAMP HOW TO#
Please advise for how to do performant index-covered data replication best as a partner in a cloud compliant app :) On this same topic, it should be mentioned that the reason we are not eagerly jumping on "Last date modified" with an index added on it, is because it is not clear to us if we can trust the value of this timestamp to be guaranteed to monotonically increase even with load balanced webservice NSTs? It is undocumented by MS if it is based on database server time with this guarantee or if it is pulled by the processing NST in which case I assume there is zero guarantee and "SQL timestamp" with an index is still better for robust data sync? This would also prevent any of us partners from needing a tableextension just to add a "fake field", ideally we don't want additional joins. However, I am not sure what it is you need to accomplish that cannot be done by reading the timestamp with the RecordRef workaround you listed (getting field 0), but would be possible if you could add the timestamp field? The timestamp field you add yourself is simply an alias to the same timestamp field you are reading with RecRef.Field(0), so it would return the sasme would one option be that you expose it on all tables by default, just like the other new system fields? You might even be retrieving it already in your NST data stack, depending on how you check stale records, in which case it would not be a change impacting your "query engine" at all? I know that doesn't make it easy, but just saying :) We are planning to support reading the timestamp field as a normal field from any table in a future version but I cannot give you a timeline for this.
#WINDOWS MASS RENAME BASED ON TIMESTAMP CODE#
TIG wrote:The initial part of the code snippet togo=" - 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1" Unfortunately, the platform does not support defining multiple timestamp fields to a single table, which could happen if we supported adding timestamp fields to table extensions (since the table + table extensions is merged into one table at runtime). Would strip off the duplicated starting reference, leaving: You can always run the code a second time with a new togo string, e.g. Togo=" - 3D - johnsmith_google_com level" So to leave the final 'ref' as say "1-01", you simply change the togo to say: Just edit that to cover what you want to delete. "4_ Light Fixture - 4_ Light Fixture-1847101- 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1-02" "4_ Light Fixture - 4_ Light Fixture-1847101- 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1-01" Specifies which string will be deleted in the components' names. The initial part of the code snippet togo=" - 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1"
I assume you mean component-definitions, rather than component-instances which can have individual names based on a shared definition.Įdit the initial togo="." to suit your needs.Ĭode: Select all togo=" - 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1" m=Sketchup.active_model m.start_operation('rename defns',true) c=0 m.definitions.each definitions renamed." m.commit_operation Paste it into the Ruby Console +, it's one step undoable. This issue is very annoying since the models imported from revit to sektchup end up having more than 100 characters. Is there a script that can remove a certain prefix or suffix? or just removing the first/last 15 or 10 characters in the name would also work. "Aluminum Sill Extension - Aluminum Sill Extension-2131210-3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1" "4_ Light Fixture - 4_ Light Fixture-1847101- 3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1" Is there a way to remove certain words from multiple components at the same time?įor example I have 50 components that their name has "3D - johnsmith_google_com level 1" at the end of the name.
0 kommentar(er)
